Showing posts with label General Electric. Show all posts
Showing posts with label General Electric. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 24, 2015

Russians and the high bypass engine in the Cold War



Russians are great in many parts in the aeronautical industry. They built the largest aircraft in history (which are still in use), built some of the best fighter jets and technology related to it. But aircraft engines aren't exactly top notch. While their first inspirations came from    research aircraft and captured German tech, their first successful engine was a reverse engineered clone of the Rolls-Royce Nene engine. The latter came from a visit of the engineers to the plant in England and managed to legally procure a copy for research, creating the Klimov VK-1.


This engine powered aircraft like the Korean War famous Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15 and the ubiquitous bomber Ilyushin Il-28 (NATO reporting name: Beagle). The Russians went on to make more powerful engines for their aircraft to properly compete with engines and aircraft from their Cold War adversary, the United States. But the US was able to develop something that the Russians took a while to counter, the high bypass turbofan. As stated before, this engine sucks more air than what goes into the heating chambers in order to provide a cool jet around the heated air in order to provide more propulsion without requiring more powerful engines. This allowed the US military to fly heavier jets while keeping fuel efficiency and great range, like the C-5 Galaxy with the General Electric TF-39 engine (which was the CF6 family of engines that powered all the wide-body, multiple aisle, airliners of that time). 


Russian engines weren't great with low bypass engines (the long & thin looking engines) as they did not have the same performance as those like the TF-39. In fact, the most modern airliner thay had at the time was the Ilyushin Il-86, which was powered by low bypass engine and usually required the entire runway to take off due to the poor performance of these engines. In fact, the Soviet Union tried to make a deal with the United States and Lockheed to purchase a license to make Soviet L-1011 Tristars because of its capabilities and engines (which would have made it the life saver and biggest purchaser of this airline).


Imagine this possibility, one of the strangest and coolest things that could've happened to aviation in the Cold War.

But the technology in the cockpit and engines was too great to share to the Soviets. So aircraft engineer Vladimir Lotarev designed the first high bypass engine for the Soviets, the Lotarev D-36.


It was a small engine, powering medium and small sized aircraft like the unique looking Ukrainian Antonov An-72 (NATO name: Coaler, Russian nickname: Cheburashka, a similarly looking large eared animated character from that region),


Improved version An-74 (Cheburashka/Coaler-A)


the Yakovlev Yak-42 (with the unflattering NATO name: Clobber)
But their advancement to this engineering tech went exponential when the Ivchenko-Progress design bureau, in Zaporizhia, Ukraine, designed the Progress D-18T.


This engine was the largest engine, at the time (beaten by the GEnx, powering the Boeing 787, GE90, powering the 777, and the Engine Alliance GP7000 or the Rolls-Royce Trent 900, either of them powering the Airbus A380), powering the largest mass produced aircraft today,Antonov An-124 (NATO name: Condor)
and the largest aircraft ever, the swansong that is the An-225 Mriya (Russian for dream/inspiration, NATO name: Cossack). 
It would be ten years before the west surpassed the Russian and Ukrainian designs with the General Electric GE90 and the others previously mentioned. The Dream/Cossack continues to be the largest aircraft flying and the Condor is somewhat larger than the largest airliner, the A380. It is likely that Ukraine pushes manufacturing of the An-124, assuming things calm down between Ukraine and Russia due to ownership of designs of that aircraft. One can only Dream, at least we will have the American/Russian collaboration with the GE90 engines (Boeing 777-300ER):


Images provided by Wikimedia Commons.

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Long Beach, Region Cuatro



            No suelo publicar sobre mi herencia latina o medios de subsistencia, con la excepción de criticar de las tonterías que ocurren con el maldito Tri. Pero tengo que hablar de la compañía antigua de McDonnell Douglas porque ellos hicieron un avión específicamente con México en su corazón, específicamente variantes de aerolíneas para su uso con el aeropuerto de la Ciudad de México. Ahora bien, no es porque la ciudad tiene cierta exclusividad de otras ciudades cosmopolitas mundiales (a pesar de ser la una de las más grandes en superficie como en población). La razón por la Ciudad de México (DF o el Distrito Federal, algo así como la manera que la gente dicen D.C. cuando hablan de la capital de E.U.A., el Distrito de Columbia) recibieron un tratamiento especial de la fábrica de Long Beach, California, era debido a que es una ciudad que está caliente y húmedo, y alto. Mientras esto suena como una espléndida manera de pasar una noche íntima con algunas personas con algunos rasgos físicos específicos, son tres ingredientes que combinan para dar una patada en los huevos a las turbinas de un avión.
Tom Hanks como la Ehecatl, dios del viento. Chavo universitario como la turbina de avion
            Para empezar, ¿alguna vez ha hecho ejercicio afuera, como trotar? ¿Si es así, te diste cuenta de que usted se le acaba el aire más rápido en el verano que en el otoño o invierno? Aire caliente es menos denso que el aire frío . Eso significa que las moléculas están más separadas y hay que respirar más aire para obtener la misma cantidad de moléculas aéreas que en un tiempo más fresco. Lo mismo ocurre para un motor a reacción. Estas máquinas necesitan que tragar más aire para producir el mismo empuje como en un día frío. Así que un avión tarda más en conseguir más empuje en el verano y tiene que utilizar más pista como resultado.

            Así pasamos al aire húmedo. Para aquellos que vivieron en alguna parte que se convierte pantanosa en el verano, como en Veracruz, Habana, Caracas, Rio de Janeiro, Cataluña, etc. también se observa que les falta aire cuando se pone muy húmedo. Incluso como un fodongo, es posible que te desesperas al punto de buscar un bonito lugar con aire acondicionado. Por lo menos yo lo hago, pero yo vivo en desierto y los lugares húmedos son tierras míticas que a veces visito cuando tengo la feria o ganas de viajar a esos lugares en mi mapa que dicen "aquí hay dragones."

            Los motores de aviones son como un corredor en un área húmeda en verano. La corredora generalmente es corto de aliento y tiene a jadear con más frecuencia si están acostumbrados a un clima más agradable. Lo mismo sucede con la turbina de un avión. La máquina está luchando para conseguir el mismo empuje que con aire más frio y necesita más tiempo para llegar a una velocidad adecuada para despegar. Esto significa que necesita una pista más larga.

            Y llegamos a mayores altitudes. A medida que se asciende el aire se vuelve menos denso ... y usted tiene la idea; un
transeúnte está reviviendo la corredora, el huevon está dentro pidiendo un hamburguesa con muchas papas fritas en un McDonald's con aire refrigerado, y estoy respirando a través de mi camisa con la vana esperanza que va a mejorar mi respiración. Así que ahora entienden que clima caliente, aire húmedo, y tierras altas = pistas largos, caso resuelto. Pero no, esto no es la solución para el aeropuerto del DF.

             El aeropuerto internacional "Benito Juárez" es como muchos aeropuertos urbanos en donde fue construido en las afueras de la ciudad hace un siglo pero ya está ahora profundamente cerca del centro metropolitano debido al crecimiento de la población. La política local han impedido a moverlo a otra parte (como el infame Peje contra los granjeros) y la ampliación de las pistas de aterrizaje significa luchar con los barrios vecinos para demolerlos al extender este asfalto. Las pistas de aterrizaje fueron construidos originalmente para la era del jet de la década de los 1960s, donde los aviones eran de una sola pasillo y el tamaño de un avión de Interjet (o Easyjet, Southwest, TACA, Copa Airlines, GOL Airways, dependiendo de donde estás leyendo esto). No fueron hechos para los A380, 777, 747 y otros aviones masivas que entran y salen de este aeropuerto en la actualidad.
Así que cuando los aviones jumbo aparecieron por primera vez en los años 1970, había un problema. Los aviones necesitan más pista de lo que había disponible en la Ciudad de México, pero también no podían sacrificar su carga y asientos para ahorrar peso y poder despegar de allí. El problema era tan grave que Boeing Aircraft Company considero instalar cohetes para asistir (Rocket Assisted Take Off - RATO ) los despegues de los 727 de Mexicana. Aviones militares normalmente utilizan RATOs para llegar al aire (como el C-130 de transporte de los Blue Angels de la Fuerza Naval Norteamericana)
Les juro que si existio!
Incluso hay video de un vuelo de prueba con estos cohetes :

             Así que cuando McDonnell Douglas diseñó el DC- 10, que tenían en mente varios versiones. El DC- 10-10 no tuvo el centro medio del tren de aterrizaje y tenía el motor menos poderoso pero serviría vuelos nacionales dentro de los Estados Unidos de América. El DC-10 -30 y DC- 10-40 tuvo motores más potentes, los tanques de combustible más grandes, y un tren de aterrizaje central para llevar más carga y pasajeros en viajes intercontinentales. Pero en el medio de estos dos estaba el DC-10 -15.

              Este avión fue diseñado específicamente para dos aerolíneas, Aeroméxico y Mexicana. Este avión tenía la turbina General Electric CF6- 50C2F (puedes decir nomas "la familia de turbinas, CF6" para ganar una estrellita de oro dentro de la comunidad de aviadores si no eres un friki de aviación) del DC-10-30 , pero tuvo la cantidad de tanques de combustible y tren de aterrizaje de un DC- 10-10 . Esto significaba que se trataba de un avión ligero con motores más potentes . Y siguiendo el concepto de fuerza bruta (o la relación potencia a peso) usted tiene un avión capaz de agarrar aire con la pista disponible en Benito Juárez.

             Y también hubo una historia similar con avión de pasajeros más pequeños de McDonnell Douglas, el DC-9 . Aunque no está diseñado específicamente para la ciudad de México, hubo un DC-9-20, que tenía los poderosos motores del DC-9-30, pero era el tamaño más pequeño de un DC-9-10 . Pero los aerolíneas mexicanos no tuvieron ningún problema utilizando las versiones normales en la ciudad de México y por lo que esta variante valió allí.
Es debido a eso que el DC-9 -15 y el DC- 9-30 perseguirán mis recuerdos como algunos de los paseos más espantoso con la flota de Aero California con cariño barato pero cómicamente mal mantenido.



Fuentes para los imagenes:
Google
Daily Mail
planespotters.blogspot.com
wikimedia commons

Long Beach Region Code Four


     I don't usually publish about my Latino heritage or livelihood, with the exception of ranting about the maldito Tri. But the former company McDonnell Douglas really had its heart set out with its clients in Mexico. In fact, two airliners had variants designed specifically for their use in Mexico City. Now, it isn't because the city has some exclusivity from other cosmopolitan global cities (although being the one of the largest in area and population doesn't hurt a bit). The reason Mexico City (or DF in Spanish for Distrito Federal or Federal District, kind of like how people call the US capital D.C. from District of Columbia) got special treatment from this Long Beach, CA manufacturer was because it is a city that is hot, humid, and high. While this sounds like a splendid way to spend an intimate night with a few people, they are three ingredients that combine to give a groin-kick to an aircraft's engines.
Tom Hanks starring as nature and college kid as the jet engine
     For starters, have you ever exercised during the year? If you have, did you notice that you are out of air quicker in the summer than in the fall, or winter? Hot air is less dense than cold air. That means the molecules are further apart and you need to gasp more air to get the same amount of air molecules than in cooler weather. Same thing happens for a jet engine. These machines needs to swallow more air to produce the same thrust as in a cooler day. So an aircraft takes longer to get more thrust and might use more runway as a result. 

      So we move on to humid air. For those who lived somewhere that becomes swampy in the summer, you also notice that you are short of breath when it gets really humid. Even as a couch potato, you might try to desperately find a nice place with air conditioning. At least I do, but I live in the desert and those humid places are mythical lands that I sometimes visit when I get the courage to travel to those spots on my map that say "here be dragons."

     The aircraft engines are like a jogger in a humid area in the summer. The jogger usually is short of breath and has to gasp more frequently if they are accustomed to nicer weather. The same thing happens to the jet engine. The machine is pushing to get that thrust with the same air and needs more time to get the aircraft to a proper speed to take off. This means it needs a longer runway.
And we get to higher altitudes. As you go higher air becomes less dense...and you get the idea; the jogger is being revived by a passing police officer, couch potato is inside ordering a number 6 at an air conditioned Wendy's, and I'm breathing through my shirt in a vain hope that it will improve my breathing.  So you are now saying, Hot, humid, high = longer runways, case solved, right? Not in the case of Mexico City.

     The Benito Juarez International Airport is like many urban airports where it was built in the outskirt of a city in an era long ago but is now deep within the metropolitan complex due to population growth. Local politics have prevented moving it elsewhere and extending the runways means fighting with nearby neighborhoods to demolish them to extend the asphalt. The runways were originally built for the original Jet Era of the 1960s where jetliners were single aisled and the size of a Southwest (or Easyjet, Air India Express, GOL Airways, etc. depending where you are from) aircraft. They were not built for the A380s, 777, 747, and other massive jumbo jets going in and out of this airport today. So when jumbo jets first came to the scene in the 1970s, there was a problem. The airliners needed more runway than what was available in Mexico City but also needed to keep its cargo and seats to profit from these flights. The problem was so serious that Boeing Aircraft Company considered installing Rocket Assisted TakeOff (RATO) devices onto Mexicana 727s. These are essentially rockets slapped onto an airliner to get it to takeoff. Military aircraft normally use RATOs to get to the air (like the Blue Angels C-130 transport).
I swear I'm not making this up!
They even filmed a test flight with these rockets:
 
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPn_iN3eeBA)
     So when McDonnell Douglas designed its three engined big fella, the DC-10, they had in mind many versions. The DC-10-10 would not have the middle center landing gear and less powerful engine but would serve domestic flights in the United States of America. The DC-10-30 and DC-10-40 would have more powerful engines, larger fuel tanks, and a central main landing gear to carry more and travel intercontinental. But in the middle was the DC-10-15.


      This aircraft was specifically designed for two airlines, Aeroméxico, and Mexicana.  This aircraft had the same powerful General Electric CF6-50C2F (just say the "CF6 family of engines" and you get a gold star sticker amongst pilots if you aren't the aviation nerd type) engines of the DC-10-30 but had the body and fuel tanks of a DC-10-10. This meant that it was a lighter aircraft with more powerful engines. And following Jeremy Clarkson's concept of POWEEERRRR over everything (or greater thrust vs. weight ratio) you have an aircraft capable of getting to the air with the available asphalt at Benito Juarez. 

     And there was also a similar story with McDonnell Douglas' smaller airliner, the DC-9. Although not specifically designed for Mexico City, there was a DC-9-20 that had the powerful engines of the DC-9-30 but was the smaller size of a DC-9-10. But the Mexican airliners had no problem using the normal variants in Mexico City.

As a result, the DC-9-15 and DC-9-30 variants will haunt my memories as some of the scariest rides with the fondly cheap but hilariously bad maintained Aero California fleet.


Image sources:
Google
Daily Mail
planespotters.blogspot.com
wikimedia commons